The reasoning for the Judgment was
explained in a detailed thirty-nine page memorandum opinion accompanying the
November 20, 2015 order. The court considered and rejected each of the
arguments raised by Venezuela in opposition to the petition to confirm,
including that: (a) the Award exceeded the scope of Venezuela’s consent to
arbitration; (b) the arbitral tribunal’s conduct during the hearing violated
Venezuela’s due-process rights; and (c) the Award is contrary to U.S. public
policy. Lastly, the court turned to Venezuela’s request that enforcement of the
Judgment be stayed pending Venezuela’s annulment application before the Paris
Court of Appeal. Finding that all relevant factors favored the Company’s
position, the court rejected Venezuela’s “effort to forestall defeat” and
denied its request to stay enforcement. More…
No comments:
Post a Comment